Friday, January 26, 2007
AP Poll and Coaches Poll
How would the NCAA convince two private organizations, the AP Poll and the Coaches Poll, to take away the 2004 National Title from USC?
Supposing that the NCAA made USC "not recognize" the Poll outcomes, the final voting in the 2004 Polls would still remain the same. They can't simply go back in time and vote a new #1.
While nothing is out of the realm of possibility, the talk of stripping Reggie of the Heisman and USC of the 2004 NC is ridiculous. These private organizations cannot be forced to do anything.
So what we could end up with is no title for USC and no Heisman for Reggie (after they break into his home to retrieve it?), but the acknowledgement that USC was voted #1 by both polls in 2004 and Reggie Bush was named the Best College Football Player in 2004 (but we stopped recognizing factual history)?
Have any of these "Yahoos" ever actually stopped to think what losing a NC or a Heisman would like, since it has never happened before (probably should not ever happen), and time travel is not possible?
Supposing that the NCAA made USC "not recognize" the Poll outcomes, the final voting in the 2004 Polls would still remain the same. They can't simply go back in time and vote a new #1.
While nothing is out of the realm of possibility, the talk of stripping Reggie of the Heisman and USC of the 2004 NC is ridiculous. These private organizations cannot be forced to do anything.
So what we could end up with is no title for USC and no Heisman for Reggie (after they break into his home to retrieve it?), but the acknowledgement that USC was voted #1 by both polls in 2004 and Reggie Bush was named the Best College Football Player in 2004 (but we stopped recognizing factual history)?
Have any of these "Yahoos" ever actually stopped to think what losing a NC or a Heisman would like, since it has never happened before (probably should not ever happen), and time travel is not possible?
